Literature citations

Relationship Between CASP9 and CASP10 Gene Polymorphisms and Cancer Susceptibility: Evidence from an Updated Meta-analysis.

Caspase-9 (CASP9) and caspase-10 (CASP10) polymorphisms were associated with human cancers; however, the results remain controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to estimate the relationship among CASP9 (rs1052576, rs1052571, rs4645978, rs4645981, rs4645982, rs2308950) and CASP10 (rs13006529, rs13010627, rs3900115) polymorphisms and the overall risk of cancers. Relevant studies were obtained from Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar databases (updated January 1, 2021). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were measured to estimate the strength of association. Our meta- analysis included 40 studies. The rs4645981 significantly enhanced the risk of cancer under TT vs. CC (OR = 2.42), TC vs. CC (OR = 1.55), TT+ TC vs. CC (OR = 1.66), TT vs. TC + CC (OR = 1.91), and T vs. C (OR = 1.57) inheritance models. As for the rs1052571 variant, increased risk of cancer was observed under TT vs. CC (OR =1.22), TC vs. CC (OR = 1.17), and TT+ TC vs. CC (OR = 1.18) models. The stratified analysis showed a significant correlation between rs4645978 or rs4645981 polymorphisms and cancer risk, while in Asians rs4645978 conferred an increased risk of colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer. Both rs4645981 and rs1052576 polymorphisms were correlated with an enhanced risk of lung cancer. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggested that CASP9 rs4645981 and rs1052571 polymorphisms are associated with overall cancer risk. More studies on larger populations are warranted to validate these associations.

Related UniProtKB entries

Browse all 10 entries
We'd like to inform you that we have updated our Privacy Notice to comply with Europe’s new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that applies since 25 May 2018.
FeedbackHelp